| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: I do of course recognise all the other entities that like having fun, you are not the only ones, but if you come to troll and only find a TCU next to a death star who is trolling who? Will this "deathstar" really make a dent i...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 12:01:37
|
22. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: I completely agree with you.. I just hope CCP can see the problem too. Small groups will only ever take and hold sov at the behest of the controlling large coalitions. Nullsec's supposed to be the survival of the fittest, not...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 11:58:14
|
23. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Vigilanta wrote: [ If a whole constellation comes out of rf in the same day and you want to win a majority of the timers this is exactly what will happen, and it unironically wont be very fun because fighting wont be the obe...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 11:00:42
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
One of the ideas I had back in the kugu days was to add some sort of border system. This system would make it so you can't really just run around and roll every system under someone's control, but you can take on their edge systems and reinforce t...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 10:46:10
|
25. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lurifax wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Lurifax wrote: So much cap so little understanding on how it will be done. If I can bring 1k ppl and you can bring 300. You are ****** from the start. 300 on the undock and another 700 ppl dicking around cap...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 10:30:52
|
26. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lurifax wrote: So much cap so little understanding on how it will be done. If I can bring 1k ppl and you can bring 300. You are ****** from the start. 300 on the undock and another 700 ppl dicking around capping nodes. Guess you should send t...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 10:26:05
|
27. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Devi Loches wrote: I have no connection to Goons whatsoever. I live in a single constellation that my alliance owns. I'm worried about these interceptors trolling and keeping me from being able to go have real fights by eithe...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 00:03:57
|
28. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: afkalt wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: it doesn't have to beat the orthrus, just not die to it until the artosis link finishes the job also i do like that you are having to use a 280m ship and ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.05 00:02:16
|
29. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: afkalt wrote: These phantom interceptors threats are nothing short of a nonsense if you live in your space. Precisely, it's no surprise that they're being hyped up as gamebreaking by TMC and on this thread - it's because ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 23:56:18
|
30. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Prime time is not good as it is, I agree - I've liked the suggestions for spreading out primetime over longer periods as an alliance grows - either on a system by system basis or on a base member count for the whole alliance may...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 21:27:47
|
31. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Second, CCP obviously isn't trying to ruin the game. They are perhaps just trying to ruin your game. I see what you did there, but I'm pretty certain we'll be able to weather these changes just fine.
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 20:25:00
|
32. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Lord TGR wrote: I'm mostly happy with the underlying premise. There are a few things I think might need tweaking, but on the whole I'm positive to it. It's Jenn aSide who's saying there are deep, grievous flaws with it. I'm...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 19:29:41
|
33. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Agent Known wrote: People rent because they don't have a supercap fleet to grind down structures or defend themselves when they get welped. The current sov mechanics vastly favors alliances with large capital fleets who are able to grind struct...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 19:14:54
|
34. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Skia Aumer wrote: Lord TGR wrote: ... the entire rationale behind the changes that need re-thinking. I'm sorry to inform you - but everything is already set in stone. There will not be any re-thinking. All you can hope for - is tweaking th...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 19:05:31
|
35. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: The opposite will probably happen. Stuffing people into a system work and spawned mega-coalitions. Now you need to do that in multiple systems at once. The best way to do that is HAVE A SUPER-MEGA COALITION lol. Why? If you ...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 19:00:17
|
36. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Actually, while the occasional big fleet is fun, having more constant fleets going up, returning, picking up reinforcements etc mean that everyone can take a more relaxed attitude to the whole fighting a wa...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 18:51:19
|
37. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aralyn Cormallen wrote: Lord TGR wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: -Really bad assumptions about what people want (even in a video game, people, especially null people, don't want 'fun' and 'lots of fights' they want power) Some people might wa...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 18:42:59
|
38. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ISD Ezwal wrote: Rain6637 wrote: Ezwal, literally the only CCP person who you know has read the thread in its entirety so far. Yes, I have. Every single post. My condolences to your sanity points.
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 15:18:37
|
39. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: -The wrong 'focus' (it's like it's trying to turn null sec , which is organized fleet space , into low sec, which is small gang space, CCP doesn't seem to understand that many null sec types are 'soldier' personalities that t...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 15:11:34
|
40. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: This is hilarious. I have visions of 500 shitfit interceptors orbiting at stupidkm/s and a single defender linking the target and the inty FC foaming at the mouth over why it wont count down. Also, all these hilarious fits - mis...
- by Lord TGR - at 2015.03.04 15:01:46
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |